🔗 Share this article

"I'll be sitting in this seat by 2027," the Prime Minister stated, noting that if our conversation was successful, he might welcome the interviewer into Number 10 for another chat in 2026.

There is never truly time off for prime ministers. Just an hour before we sat down, Starmer had been on the phone with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky and working to understand exactly what had occurred in Venezuela, where his big political chum, US President Donald Trump, had just launched a strike against and detained its leader, Nicolás Maduro.

By the time our lengthy talk, which was considerably lengthier than usual, had finished, Maduro had been indicted in New York.

Renewed Energy for the New Year

But as the year commences, the Prime Minister seems to have had a kind of a revitalisation. Perhaps even just a bit of downtime with the family at Chequers, the prime minister's official country residence.

This appeared to have put him in improved morale than at the saggy conclusion of 2025, a awful annus horribilis for him.

But are he and his allies deluding themselves if they think his political fate are poised to get better?

Leadership Questions

The uncomfortable reality for the prime minister is that a significant number of his party members believe he's underperforming at his job. A faction of them would rather take a risk and oust him sooner rather than later.

However Starmer was dismissing such talk when we spoke on Saturday morning.

Repeatedly he insisted he'd be "evaluated at the next election", maintaining nobody would take his five-year mandate from him – despite the fact that the most effective strategy of halting Nigel Farage and Reform UK entering No 10 might be for Labour to replace leader.

"This is the fight of our generation and I plan to be at the forefront," he affirmed.

The May Elections

The problem for the PM is that he will be judged long before then – in a huge set of elections in May across the UK. He attempted to protest, maybe too much, that they are concerning who runs local authorities, and who runs the governments in Holyrood or Cardiff – and not about Westminster.

Accurate – to some extent. But even though he may be reluctant to concede it, No 10 will be held accountable by those elections too.

Despite this, Sir Keir implying that there were no circumstances under which he would walk away, even if a his MPs challenged him for the job, should those elections be catastrophic for Labour.

An Optimistic Outlook

He tried to explain his unpopularity by saying the public was reasonably anxious for things to get better. He aimed to persuade the interviewer, and the nation, that the coming months would be distinct.

The economic situation would recover despite rising unemployment, he said, when strategies the government enacted during their first choppy year began to take effect.

• He vowed to shut asylum hotels ahead of the current target date of 2029, although he wouldn't put a specific date on that.
• He said too, with the qualification that it wasn't a certainty, that a settlement in Ukraine felt a greater possibility now than at any point since Russia's comprehensive invasion.
• He stated for the first time that Western partners were now talking about how to combine US and European forces to ensure security for Ukraine – to protect a potential peace.

His core message is that this year the country will "reach a turning point".

Familiar Arguments

The prime minister may have communicated with greater vigour than observed from him for a some time – less tense, maybe, with a longer slot to talk.

However, in spite of facing pressure from many directions for a more decisive strategy, with greater political vision, more dynamism, more pace and more urgency, his points were repeated ones.

When he finds himself in such significant political peril, is a different approach required a different script?

No administration, and certainly not one that has been unpopular for an extended period, has everything its as planned.

Sir Keir's challenges are not just because governing is difficult, but because he and his team have erred, including in the recent past.

Controversies and Dangers

The prime minister admitted that he was sorry for saying he was "delighted" to welcome back the Egyptian-British activist Alaa Abd El Fattah to the UK following an controversy when comments he'd previously made – such as calls for Zionists and police to be killed – resurfaced.

Starmer attributed it to "the system" for failing to identify what the activist had said before – a fancier way of saying not my fault.

And he is facing clear political risks as the year gets going. His close relationship with the US president acquires a new complication after Trump's military action on Venezuela.

Having interviewed Sir Keir Starmer, a ex- human rights lawyer who was against the war in Iraq, over a long period, the notion he would be comfortable with this kind of intervention seems far-fetched.

International Law and Brexit

He asserted he was a "lifelong champion of international law" but the public "simply haven't got the complete details at the moment".

Critics demanded condemn it prior to we spoke. And the administration is expected to face further scrutiny to give an clear view in Parliament in the next few days.

There has also always been bubbling tension in the Labour party to revisit some of the consequences of Brexit.

Sir Keir rejects he's doing that, but his new specific pledge to integrate further with the EU's single market – the huge economic European market – will probably provoke howls that he is going back on his pledge never to try to reverse the decisions that stemmed from Brexit.

A decision to align with more of the single market will satisfy some on his side of the party, but it is easy fodder for Reform and the Conservatives to